On Wed, Nov 13, 2019, 6:08 PM David Vandevoorde via Core < c...@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 13, 2019, at 6:56 PM, Richard Smith via Core < > c...@lists.isocpp.org> wrote: > > > > Hi core and SG10! > > > > (Noticed by Jens when reviewing the merge of CWG motion 8.) > > > > P1907R1 made significant changes to the behavior of non-type template > parameters. It should have affected some feature-test macro, but didn't. > Should we bump the version of __cpp_nontype_template_args or > __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class? > > > A bump in __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class seems appropriate to me. > > Daveed > I agree. This is the one introduced by P0732. I'd emailed Jens on Friday to say the same but he missed the email. Is this editorial or does this need to go through a paper/issue? Barry >
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list Features@isocpp.open-std.org http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
