On 14/11/2019 01.14, Barry Revzin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019, 6:08 PM David Vandevoorde via Core 
> <c...@lists.isocpp.org <mailto:c...@lists.isocpp.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     > On Nov 13, 2019, at 6:56 PM, Richard Smith via Core 
> <c...@lists.isocpp.org <mailto:c...@lists.isocpp.org>> wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi core and SG10!
>     >
>     > (Noticed by Jens when reviewing the merge of CWG motion 8.)
>     >
>     > P1907R1 made significant changes to the behavior of non-type template 
> parameters. It should have affected some feature-test macro, but didn't. 
> Should we bump the version of __cpp_nontype_template_args or 
> __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class?
>
>
>     A bump in __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class seems appropriate to me.
>
>             Daveed
>
>
> I agree. This is the one introduced by P0732. I'd emailed Jens on Friday to 
> say the same but he missed the email.

I did see your e-mail, that's why I made the review comment in the editorial
process. I apparently misnamed the feature-test macro in my review comment, 
though :-(

Jens

_______________________________________________
Features mailing list
Features@isocpp.open-std.org
http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features

Reply via email to