On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaball...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On 2/2/2015 9:35 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote: > > Apologies, especially to Ed, for the long silence. > > > > Here is an updated document. > > Apologies for coming late to the party (I have just subscribed to the > reflector), but why was `__cpp_digit_separators` removed? > Because there is no reasonable way that code can use it to adapt to the presence or absence of the feature. Furthermore, N4277 (TriviallyCopyable reference_wrapper) has a > question-mark next to "none". I see no reason for a macro for this > feature, as it is intended to be detected via the corresponding trait. > Incidentally, I was the author of such paper. > > Regards, > -- > Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- > http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com > _______________________________________________ > Features mailing list > Features@isocpp.open-std.org > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features >
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list Features@isocpp.open-std.org http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
