On 02/03/2015 01:35 AM, Nelson, Clark wrote: > Here is an updated document. I have added __cpp_noexcept as Ed proposed, and > __cpp_forward_decl_enum, as he appears to have proposed. Ed didn't seem to > make any other positive proposals, but I received an independent suggestion > about explicit conversion operators, so I have added it as well.
We did quite a bit of surgery to enumerations in C++11, e.g. we can now have explicit base types and scoping etc. I'm wondering why we're highlighting the "forward declaration" part, as opposed to just "__cpp_extended_enum" or simply "__cpp_enum", with suitably-changing values? Thanks, Jens _______________________________________________ Features mailing list Features@isocpp.open-std.org http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
