> Would the conclusion of that position be that we don't backfill for > features that are already implemented in every shipping compiler we're > collectively aware of?
That's pretty much where we started back in Bristol. Our first draft had 8 C++11 macros, all suggested by Tom as things that were real-world concerns for the Plum Hall suite at the time. The first publication of SD-6 had 10. When I updated SD-6 a month ago, we were up to 17. And now that I think back, I recall that all the new ones were added at the last minute before the pre-Urbana mailing. I was reluctant to do them in a rush, but I acquiesced. (It may have been a mistake to present that table as a stub in the first place, thereby inviting completion. Formally speaking, of course it was incomplete at that time, but for real-world practical purposes, it may already have been as complete as it ever needed to be.) Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list Features@isocpp.open-std.org http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
