Thank you again and greetings
I am wondering a little about the data model in play here. I may have missed an earlier part of this conversation, but I wonder if you could describe your domain problem a little, M. Jallud? Perhaps we can find a more efficient and idiomatic way to use Fedora's CMA than is now obvious to you... to have more than a few dozen datastreams in a content model is very unusual and implies the possibility of useful refactoring.--- A. Soroka Digital Research and Scholarship R& D and Online Library Environment the University of Virginia Library On Dec 20, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Asger Askov Blekinge wrote: > Sounds about right, but this is not a hard limit. > > As you know, Fedora stores the datastreams in one big xml file. > > What is the maximum size of xml files? How many elements can there be in > an xml list? How long do you want to wait for fedora to parse this > object? Those are the relevant questions, and by answering them, you > will have answered your original question. > > Regards > > > On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 14:54 +0100, Pierre-Yves JALLUD wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> I'm using 3.2.1 version of FedoraCommons. I wonder what is the maximum >> number of datastreams that we can add in a single object. My experiments >> seem to demonstrate that this number is around 32000 (32768?...). Is >> that true? Is that always true in the last versions? >> >> Thanks for your answers. >> Pierre-Yves
<<attachment: pierre-yves_jallud.vcf>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
