Hi. Maybe I'm missing something here, but wouldn't be a better approach to create new objects (each with 1 (or some, but not 100s) datastream) for each file and have them relate to the primary object https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCR30/Digital+Object+Relationships ?
Instead of having 1 object with 1000s datastreams, you have 1 object linked to 1000s objects (each with one datastream). Unless you *REALLY* need all to reside in one big XML... Pierre-Yves JALLUD, 21-12-2010 14:52: > Thanks for your answers. That conforts me in the idea that the objects I > wanted to store in FedoraCommons are not adapted for this kind of > system. I'll impose to the users to split there archives in an > acceptable number of files. They used to have a maximum of 1000 or 2000 > datastreams (exceptionaly) and FC has correct answers' times. That will > be the limit of my system. > Thank you again and greetings > >> I am wondering a little about the data model in play here. I may have >> missed an earlier part of this conversation, but I wonder if you could >> describe your domain problem a little, M. Jallud? >> Perhaps we can find a more efficient and idiomatic way to use Fedora's >> CMA than is now obvious to you... to have more than a few dozen >> datastreams in a content model is very unusual and >> implies the possibility of useful refactoring. >> >> --- >> A. Soroka >> Digital Research and Scholarship R& D and Online Library Environment >> the University of Virginia Library >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 20, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Asger Askov Blekinge wrote: >> >> > Sounds about right, but this is not a hard limit. >> > >> > As you know, Fedora stores the datastreams in one big xml file. >> > >> > What is the maximum size of xml files? How many elements can there >> be in >> > an xml list? How long do you want to wait for fedora to parse this >> > object? Those are the relevant questions, and by answering them, you >> > will have answered your original question. >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > >> > On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 14:54 +0100, Pierre-Yves JALLUD wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm using 3.2.1 version of FedoraCommons. I wonder what is the maximum >> >> number of datastreams that we can add in a single object. My >> experiments >> >> seem to demonstrate that this number is around 32000 (32768?...). Is >> >> that true? Is that always true in the last versions? >> >> >> >> Thanks for your answers. >> >> Pierre-Yves > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Lotusphere 2011 > Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how > to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment > to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-commons-users mailing list > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
