Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-01-12 18:24:38 EDT --- Thank you for working on this I realise it's not easy to be the first TEX packager to adapt your packages. Anyway, some QA feedback: 1. you need to add the template (build)requires on fontpackages* for build mock/koji to work 2. you have several different font families in this package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_is_this_font_family_thing.3F Each one needs a separate font subpackage http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#How_many_font_files_can_I_put_in_a_font_.28sub.29package.3F 3. since you'll have multiple font subpackages, you need to create a common subpackage they depend on that will own the font package directory and the fonts COPYING 4. I'm not sure your (duplicated) %define fontpkg \-n\ cm-lgc-fonts is a good idea then. 5. are you sure you can not use a subpackages named srpmname-foo? Removing the srpmname prefix will confuse users. 6. some fontconfig files would be nice, there are good templates in fontpackages-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
