Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #5 from Sarantis Paskalis <[email protected]> 2009-01-13 04:41:59 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback. (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you for working on this I realise it's not easy to be the first TEX > packager to adapt your packages. Anyway, some QA feedback: > > 1. you need to add the template (build)requires on fontpackages* for build > mock/koji to work Bah, I would swear I had them in earlier versions. Will fix. > 2. you have several different font families in this package. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_is_this_font_family_thing.3F > > Each one needs a separate font subpackage > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#How_many_font_files_can_I_put_in_a_font_.28sub.29package.3F I am aware of that. However, the separation of the font families is a somewhat more difficult problem (the filenames are not so intuitive), so I left them to a later point in time. Well, ok I will give it a shot, since I already did it to mgopen-fonts. > 3. since you'll have multiple font subpackages, you need to create a common > subpackage they depend on that will own the font package directory and the > fonts COPYING OK. > 4. I'm not sure your (duplicated) %define fontpkg \-n\ cm-lgc-fonts is a good > idea then. Thanks for pointing to the duplication. What I was trying to do is having a subpackage name in line with other font packages (such as mgopen-fonts) instead of (te)tex-font-cm-lgc). Since a rename of the package is in order, and the font packages already carry the %{fontname}-fonts name, cm-lgc-fonts fits for the srpm name, cm-lgc-fonts-common, cm-lgc-fonts-roman, etc for the different families, and tex-fonts-cm-lgc for the TeX specific stuff. I think that would be the straightforward way of dealing with the mess The alternative would be to call the srpm tex-fonts-cm-lgc and suffix it with -common, -roman, -sans, etc. This, however, leads to names such as tex-font-cm-lgc-roman, which is not compatible with the rest of the fedora font packages. > 5. are you sure you can not use a subpackages named srpmname-foo? Removing the > srpmname prefix will confuse users. See above. > 6. some fontconfig files would be nice, there are good templates in > fontpackages-devel OK, I will come up with some fontconfig stuff for the families only (the encodings are a really dark area). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
