Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan <at> gmail.com> writes: > The fact that there's no visible license makes me think it's not Open > Source or Free within the accepted guidelines, just that they provide > source code.
The source files have clear GPLv2+ license headers. It's just the copy of the
GPL which is missing.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
