On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 01:52 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan <at> gmail.com> writes: > > The fact that there's no visible license makes me think it's not Open > > Source or Free within the accepted guidelines, just that they provide > > source code. > > The source files have clear GPLv2+ license headers. It's just the copy of the > GPL which is missing.
OK. I just looked at the web page and the README, neither of which mention licensing. poc -- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
