Simon Slater wrote: > Thanks Matt. I saw dnsmasq mentioned in one how-to but didn't chase it > since I was focussing on DHCP and bind.
DHCP is a protocol and bind is an implementation (of DNS, mainly). You're comparing apples to orchardists. Now there are half a dozen > boxes, but will increase to 2 dozen over the next year. Is this still > within the scope of dnsmasq? I believe so. > Realising there are a variety of solutions, I don't want > to come against Ockham's Razor. Right, I think dnsmasq is simple but will get your job done. Matt Flaschen -- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
