On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 06:39 -0500, Matthew Flaschen wrote: > Simon Slater wrote: > > Thanks Matt. I saw dnsmasq mentioned in one how-to but didn't chase it > > since I was focussing on DHCP and bind. > > DHCP is a protocol and bind is an implementation (of DNS, mainly). > You're comparing apples to orchardists. > These are the types of distinctions I need to get clear.
> Now there are half a dozen > > boxes, but will increase to 2 dozen over the next year. Is this still > > within the scope of dnsmasq? > > I believe so. > > > Realising there are a variety of solutions, I don't want > > to come against Ockham's Razor. > > Right, I think dnsmasq is simple but will get your job done. > > Matt Flaschen > > I'll read up on it tomorrow. -- Regards, Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/ -- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
