Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-24 09:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > OK, it builds now. Still no parallel make, although it doesn't seem to hurt > anything when I enable it. added %{?_smp_mflags} > rpmlint complains about all of the .h and .c files from the c_src directory. > I > don't know much about Erlang but I doubt these are needed at runtime. Can > they > be shifted out to a -devel package without breaking things? I split off a devel package. There is now an problem report by rpmlint indicating that there are only non-binaries in /usr/lib in esdl-devel. This should be ignored. > Finally, since this is an Erlang package (perhaps the first in Extras), might > we > consider avoiding some of the mess that Python is in and adopt a reasonable > Perl-like naming convention like erlang-SDL or erlang-esdl? This might be worth considering. However, AFAIK, other distributions don't do it, so it would possibly create some confusion. Package at the usual place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
