Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-13 17:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > We need to be consistent here: > rpmlint is complaining about putting an application in setuid how could > you suggest to do this? > Clement is started un root priviledges and lets them go as soon > proper port (SMTP) are open, to do this it seteuid with the application > program > ownership. So there is NO purpose to put clement setuid, not from the > security stand point, not from the rpmlint stand point, not from application > stand point. > I think you understood me wrong here, I didn't want to suggest to make %attr(-,mail,mail) %{_usr}/bin/%{name} setuid, I thought it was setuid and that was why it has owner and group mail, if its not setuid, then why not just owner and group root? > file in %{_usr}/lib are shell for clement application (utilities, support), > shell are not archs dependent. > OK. You still haven't explained why you do: %attr(-,mail,mail) %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ Instead of just: %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ Or is that just a copy and paste error and will you fix that with the next version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
