Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225246


Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu>  2009-01-13 16:05:25 EDT 
---
Yes, the explicit lib dependency bits are obviously bogus and you can't really
fix the changelog.  The hardcoded-library-path complaints are bogus as well. 
That clears rpmlint.

The other issues have all been fixed, so I'd say we're done.  Thanks for your
attention.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to