Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #3 from Jindrich Novy <[email protected]> 2009-06-17 02:47:09 EDT --- Milos, thanks for taking the review and posting here the mailing WRT the XZ utils packaging. I see I was not the first one to package XZ :) The lzma and xz does conflict so better to IMO obsolete the old lzma by xz. I added the obsoletion and provides to the spec. XZ supports old lzma format as well az XZ so there should be no compatibility issues. Ville, thanks for your spec. It helped me to add the pkgconfig dependency to xz-devel. Another thing is version which is wierd -> 4.999.8beta. Should we move the beta to release as Ville did? This seems to be the last release before the XZ-5 so is that worth the trouble? I'll ask upstream about the lzmainfo. BTW. spec and SRPM is now updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
