Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> 2009-06-18 16:48:45 EDT --- Doesn't really fly: [r...@turre rpm]# rpm -Uvh /home/pmatilai/rpmbuild/RPMS/xz-4.999.8-0.3beta.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/pmatilai/rpmbuild/RPMS/xz-libs-4.999.8-0.3beta.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/pmatilai/rpmbuild/RPMS/xz-devel-4.999.8-0.3beta.fc11.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: lzma is needed by (installed) man-1.6f-20.fc11.x86_64 lzma is needed by (installed) rpm-build-4.7.0.git9198-1.fc11.lorg.x86_64 liblzmadec.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) libarchive-2.6.2-1.fc11.x86_64 How about we simply leave out the lzma bits from the xz package? Ie dont obsolete or conflict with anything, and only include the actual xz binaries in the main package: /usr/bin/unxz /usr/bin/xz /usr/bin/xzcat /usr/bin/xzdec -libs and -devel are not a problem as they dont conflict and those are the only bits that rpm really needs for payload compression, /usr/bin/xz is only useful for supporting xz compressed sources in build, the old stable lzma can be used to provide the /usr/bin/*lz* bits for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
