You can read the history of the first book on Wikipedia. Check out this quote:

In August 1999 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone topped the New York Times list of best-selling fiction,[35] and stayed near the top of the list for much of 1999 and 2000, until the New York Times split its list into children's and adult sections under pressure from other publishers who were eager to see their books given higher placings.[23][33] Publishers Weekly's report in December 2001 on cumulative sales of children's fiction placed Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone 19th among hardbacks (over 5 million copies) and 7th among paperbacks (over 6.6 million copies).

And check out this list from Wikipedia and notice the "Number of books" column for Rowling. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_fiction_authors

-Ray

On 12/20/2011 11:15 AM, Chris Fowler wrote:
Well I've got to say it, I'd never even heard about Harry potter before
the first film was made. I personally think that the film brought the HP
books into the lime light, and made them the success they became.
--Chris--

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* S Lismore <mailto:[email protected]>
    *To:* feistfans-l <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Tuesday, December 20, 2011 6:54 PM
    *Subject:* Re: Possible answer

    Potter unfortunatly was probably more succesfull because kids could
    associate with him more, and grow with him. Potter starts out the
    outcast, goes to a big school is bullied ( well they try anyway). he
    breaks rules but gains respect from his peers ie teachers, never
    mind flying on a broom having a pet owl and flying cars. Just not as
    easy to associate with a dragon or Thomas. With being a prisoner and
    slave yes kids can read of slavery but in our modern life it just
    does not give the direct input that risking discapline from your
    teachers does.
    Kids might fantasice of having a pet dragon or even flying to other
    worlds but reality hits home nobody alive has travelled to another
    planet only to the moon, dragons well does anyone know one who has
    one as a pet other than the bearded type more akin to Fantus than
    some giant monster able to carry you were ever you want to go, yet
    people do have owls as pets.
    And to top it all Pug grows up quickly and is then an adult again
    distant from kids and their own reality, and potter brings back
    childhood memories for many grown ups many who will have read the
    books either to their children or sneeking a few pages when the kids
    were not watching to see what the fusss was about.
    Jimmy the hand is for me the closest character to potter and is also
    one of the most interesting characters created by Ray, you get to
    follow him growing up more and this gives added depth to his
    character IMHO.

    On 20 December 2011 18:21, Timothy Sikora <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Besides, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. ;)



        On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Raymond E. Feist
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


            On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:03 AM, parch antisko wrote:

             > Hello,
             >
             > I remember Ray, you were pondering why Rowling's Potter
            is much more
             > successful than Magician. I think I have found a possible
            answer while
             > reading Carl Gustav Jung's Psychology of the unconscious.
            He is
             > writing:
             >
             > "Faust has need of the phallic magic wand (in the magic
            strength of
             > which he has at first no confidence), in order to perform
            the greatest
             > of wonders, namely, the creation of Paris and Helen."
             >
             > H.Potter is using a fallic symbol, it focuses the libido
            and is a
             > hidden symbol for young people who are attracted to it
            through this.
             > Suble sexuality is also in the Meyer's New Moon book
            which she
             > admitted in the interview I heard in the radio and she
            knew it will
             > attrack young girls to read.
             >
             > Maybe it is total crap but I had to say it :)
             >
             > P
             >


            Ah, you have me confused with another writer. I know exactly
            why Potter is more popular than Pug. More people wanted to
            read about him.

            Jo Rowling did a brilliant job of writing something kids and
            parents wanted to read together. And it was contemporary,
            and it was charming.

            Best, R.E.F.
            ----
            www.crydee.com <http://www.crydee.com/>

            Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be
            explained away by stupidity.










        --
        Interested in improving your health? Visit our websites!
        http://www.sustainablywell.com/
        http://www.goodherbs.com/sustainablywell/
        http://www.northamericanpharmacal.com/affiliates/sgsikora.php



Reply via email to