On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 1:12 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > As I said I wanted to enjoy Feists works, I did not wish to find these > flaws. Can I suggest if many of you are so aggrieved with what I saying, you > address my points sensibly?
Let's make this simple. One of your arguments was that Ray's works are too predictable. That's a subjective judgment, but you hurt your point by giving an example of what you are SURE is true -- an example that is laughably false. A minor spoiler warning for Magician follows, but.... The king is just sick. Dementia, senility, whatever...he's sick, and dies by the end of Magician. Succession is then a major issue. But wait...you saw that coming too, didn't you? Everything else you say is subjective opinion. How can anyone argue with subjective opinion? If you don't like Ray's work, then fine - don't read any of it (which, it appears, is pretty much what you're doing). But given your poorly-written emails and web site, it's laughable to promote your work as better. Seriously -- I literally laughed out loud. You're doing a great job at getting attention, but not all publicity is good publicity. If I ever see your name on a published work -- something I'd wager is highly improbable at this point, based on your conduct and samples of your writing so far -- be assured I won't be buying it.
