Ray, Should that be WUTLB now :-) ?
Jim -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raymond E. Feist Sent: Thursday, 12 April 2012 11:39 AM To: feistfans-l Subject: Re: Pugs parents On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Allan Mills wrote: > -----Original Message----- From: Raymond E. Feist > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 2:01 AM > To: feistfans-l > Subject: Re: Pugs parents > > >> On Apr 5, 2012, at 5:49 AM, Parks White wrote: >> >>> Back to the topic: >>> >>> 1. Pug's parentage is currently "unknown". >>> >>> While it currently may seem just an offhand "throwaway" comment, and >>> eliminating the lesbian bargirls and iincestuous time travellers as >>> serious parenting options, I still think >Kalkin is a good >>> Candidate for Pug's father. it would be his greatest trick yet. It >>> explains Pug's magical abilities and special relationship to Kalkin >>> rather nicely. Perhaps this may be >revealed in future >>> publications?(or not) >>> >>> 2. If Kalkin is the father it begs the question who might Pugs mother be? >>> >>> >>> >> >> I have said more than once on this list and it was mentioned in the series, the identity of his parents (specific to the reader) are unknown. Obviously, Macros knew who they were as >he was keeping an eye on Pug since he was born. A kitchen girl and a soldier were his parents. >> > > I must have forgotten if it was explained, but why exactly was he watching Pug from such an early age? Was he born with enough magical potential to show up his "radar"? > WUTNB. Best, R.E.F. ---- www.crydee.com Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
