WUTNB?
-----Original Message----- From: Smith, Boyd W SGT MIL USA FORSCOM <[email protected]> To: feistfans-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Apr 11, 2012 9:33 pm Subject: Re: Pugs parents I KNEW IT!!!!!!!!!! I just knew a WUTNB was coming. Something told me that between speculation here, the interest and the upcoming end of the series that this would be part of the ending. bws ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond E. Feist" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:08 Subject: Re: Pugs parents To: feistfans-l <[email protected]> > > On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Allan Mills wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- From: Raymond E. Feist > > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 2:01 AM > > To: feistfans-l > > Subject: Re: Pugs parents > > > > > >> On Apr 5, 2012, at 5:49 AM, Parks White wrote: > >> > >>> Back to the topic: > >>> > >>> 1. Pug's parentage is currently "unknown". > >>> > >>> While it currently may seem just an offhand "throwaway" > comment, and eliminating the lesbian bargirls and iincestuous time > travellers as serious parenting options, I still think >Kalkin is > a good Candidate for Pug's father. it would be his greatest trick > yet. It explains Pug's magical abilities and special relationship > to Kalkin rather nicely. Perhaps this may be >revealed in future > publications?(or not) > >>> > >>> 2. If Kalkin is the father it begs the question who might Pugs > mother be? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> I have said more than once on this list and it was mentioned in > the series, the identity of his parents (specific to the reader) > are unknown. Obviously, Macros knew who they were as >he was > keeping an eye on Pug since he was born. A kitchen girl and a > soldier were his parents. > >> > > > > I must have forgotten if it was explained, but why exactly was > he watching Pug from such an early age? Was he born with enough > magical potential to show up his "radar"? > > > > WUTNB. > > Best, R.E.F. > > ---- > www.crydee.com > > Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained > away by stupidity. > > > > > > >
