On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 10:46 -0700, Raoul Duke wrote: > back to the point / quote at the top of this message: having a > smoothly running environment in terms of revision control, building, > testing and installing - as well as docs, but that's more > pie-in-the-sky usually - would give a long-term return on investments, > and it would really let new folks get involved. i can't see how you > answering the raft of "how to build? why doesn't it work on my > machine? which branch actually builds?" questions ever again is a good > use of anybody's time. > > i'd suggest that if you really do have $ that you fund somebody to get > all those infrastructure issues in tip-top shape first and foremost.
Felix builds 'out of the box' on Unixen, OSX, Cygwin, MingW, Win32 and Win64. Do you know ANY other system that can build such a complex suite of software -- and test it -- on all those platforms? I don't. Over 6 months was spent full time on the build system. Interscript took 3 years to write. The interscript documentation builds on all platforms too, and the Ocamldocs should also do that. [Obviously Doxygen docs need doxygen .. :] Yes, we do have problems of course .. but there's no way to fix them unless users report them. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language