On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 10:46 -0700, Raoul Duke wrote:

> back to the point / quote at the top of this message: having a
> smoothly running environment in terms of revision control, building,
> testing and installing - as well as docs, but that's more
> pie-in-the-sky usually - would give a long-term return on investments,
> and it would really let new folks get involved. i can't see how you
> answering the raft of "how to build? why doesn't it work on my
> machine? which branch actually builds?" questions ever again is a good
> use of anybody's time.
> 
> i'd suggest that if you really do have $ that you fund somebody to get
> all those infrastructure issues in tip-top shape first and foremost.

Felix builds 'out of the box' on Unixen, OSX, Cygwin, MingW, 
Win32 and Win64. Do you know ANY other system that can build
such a complex suite of software -- and test it -- on all
those platforms? I don't. Over 6 months was spent full time
on the build system. Interscript took 3 years to write.
The interscript documentation builds on all platforms too,
and the Ocamldocs should also do that. [Obviously Doxygen docs 
need doxygen .. :]

Yes, we do have problems of course .. but there's no way to fix
them unless users report them. 

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language

Reply via email to