I agree that I would
want to know about possible risks, too. I think as long as they present it
appropriately, then it is up to people to do their own research and
decide. To me, there are risks in everything, no matter which way you
go. I think a lot of times, it isn't even a black-and-white matter of
saying one thing is riskier than another, but it just depends on those
particular circumstances. I think also sometimes it is more than just a
matter of the likelihood of something happening, but also how severe the
consequence is. For example, they say there is less risk of an accident
while flying vs. driving. Maybe so, but if there IS an accident while
flying, the risk of dying is greater. So I think it is just a matter of
evaluating each situation and deciding for ourselves. The other problem
institutions, etc. run into is the fear of lawsuits. So they feel they
must "overprotect" to avoid this. To me, no way around it, it's just that
there are no easy answers because you can't try to have one set of "rules" and
still address the differences that exist in everyone. Some people are more
capable of doing research and making decisions. But I do think that
sometimes the "authorities" present info. inappropriately, but also, the people
are at fault if they just accept it and/or rely only on their emotions to
make decisions.
|
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') gwork
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') gwork
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') Belinda
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') Tad Burnett
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') Nina
- Tad catatonya
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') wendy
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') Sheila208
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') felv
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') catatonya
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') catatonya
- Re: Testing saliva for FeLV (was 'interesting') Tad Burnett