At 04:33 AM 9/12/2006, you wrote:
Amazing?? sort of like sending a woman to jail for using drugs in her
first trimester because it might hurt the baby but giving her
permission to have an abortion
Go figure
Kelly
Nina, I woke up this morning thinking how ironic it is that the
internist does not want to try chemo without a definitive diagnosis
but wanted to pts without one. If it is cancer it is lymphoma, given
where it is and how it responds to steroids. If she thinks it could
be something other than cancer, then why did she want to pts without
further diagnostic tests first? There is something really wrong
with that picture. I don't think it's just here, I think it's lots
of vets. They find it more ok to pts than to treat in any way that
is not completely by the book.
Michelle
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/444 - Release Date: 9/11/2006
