On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:33:41PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:58:51AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: >> > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:32:53PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: >> > > Wasn't the deal that we should merge UFC into FFC, and not the >> other way >> > > around? >> > >> > Yes, of course. At least I got it right in the issue... >> > >> > > Before we switch from cmake to distutils in ufc I suggest we make >> the >> > > shared_ptr switch in UFC/DOLFIN. I can take responsibility for >> this >> > switch in >> > > the SWIG layer. >> > >> > Great, that's the hard part. I could do the switch in UFC and >> DOLFIN >> > but I'm not sure it would help. I expect many things will break >> until >> > the SWIG layer is fixed. >> > >> > >> > Sure no Python tests will run until we have the SWIG layer in place. >> > >> > >> > Would it help if I switched in UFC + DOLFIN (except for SWIG) and >> > pushed to new branches, or is it just as easy to run dolfinreplace? >> > >> > >> > A lot of things can be done with dolfiunreplace, but things are bound >> to >> go >> > wrong. So if you make the switch in the DOLFIN/UFC/FFC C++ layer first >> and at >> > least make everything compile. I also suggest that you get the C++ code >> > generation in-place too before we fix the SWIG layer. >> >> I have made the switch on the C++ side in UFC and DOLFIN branches >> >> logg/topic-c++11 >> >> >> Ok, I will have a look at the SWIG layer later this week. > > ok, great. > > Who knows distutils best? Perhaps Johannes could look at the switch > from CMake to distutils in UFC?
I can take a look if you want. Johannes _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
