Note that Dorsal still hasn't been updated accordingly. --Nico
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:05:07AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:33:41PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:58:51AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:32:53PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: >> >> > > Wasn't the deal that we should merge UFC into FFC, and not the >> >> other way >> >> > > around? >> >> > >> >> > Yes, of course. At least I got it right in the issue... >> >> > >> >> > > Before we switch from cmake to distutils in ufc I suggest we >> >> make >> >> the >> >> > > shared_ptr switch in UFC/DOLFIN. I can take responsibility >> >> for this >> >> > switch in >> >> > > the SWIG layer. >> >> > >> >> > Great, that's the hard part. I could do the switch in UFC and >> >> DOLFIN >> >> > but I'm not sure it would help. I expect many things will break >> >> until >> >> > the SWIG layer is fixed. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Sure no Python tests will run until we have the SWIG layer in place. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Would it help if I switched in UFC + DOLFIN (except for SWIG) >> >> and >> >> > pushed to new branches, or is it just as easy to run >> >> dolfinreplace? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > A lot of things can be done with dolfiunreplace, but things are >> >> bound to >> >> go >> >> > wrong. So if you make the switch in the DOLFIN/UFC/FFC C++ layer >> >> first >> >> and at >> >> > least make everything compile. I also suggest that you get the C++ >> >> code >> >> > generation in-place too before we fix the SWIG layer. >> >> >> >> I have made the switch on the C++ side in UFC and DOLFIN branches >> >> >> >> logg/topic-c++11 >> >> >> >> >> >> Ok, I will have a look at the SWIG layer later this week. >> > >> > ok, great. >> > >> > Who knows distutils best? Perhaps Johannes could look at the switch >> > from CMake to distutils in UFC? >> >> I can take a look if you want. > > Thanks! > > -- > Anders > _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
