On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:05:07AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:33:41PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>     On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:58:51AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> >>     > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
> >>     >
> >>     >     On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:32:53PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> >>     >     > Wasn't the deal that we should merge UFC into FFC, and not the
> >>     other way
> >>     >     > around?
> >>     >
> >>     >     Yes, of course. At least I got it right in the issue...
> >>     >
> >>     >     > Before we switch from cmake to distutils in ufc I suggest we 
> >> make
> >>     the
> >>     >     > shared_ptr switch in UFC/DOLFIN. I can take responsibility for 
> >> this
> >>     >     switch in
> >>     >     > the SWIG layer.
> >>     >
> >>     >     Great, that's the hard part. I could do the switch in UFC and 
> >> DOLFIN
> >>     >     but I'm not sure it would help. I expect many things will break 
> >> until
> >>     >     the SWIG layer is fixed.
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     > Sure no Python tests will run until we have the SWIG layer in place.
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >     Would it help if I switched in UFC + DOLFIN (except for SWIG) and
> >>     >     pushed to new branches, or is it just as easy to run 
> >> dolfinreplace?
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     > A lot of things can be done with dolfiunreplace, but things are 
> >> bound to
> >>     go
> >>     > wrong. So if you make the switch in the DOLFIN/UFC/FFC C++ layer 
> >> first
> >>     and at
> >>     > least make everything compile. I also suggest that you get the C++ 
> >> code
> >>     > generation in-place too before we fix the SWIG layer.
> >>
> >>     I have made the switch on the C++ side in UFC and DOLFIN branches
> >>
> >>       logg/topic-c++11
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok, I will have a look at the SWIG layer later this week.
> >
> > ok, great.
> >
> > Who knows distutils best? Perhaps Johannes could look at the switch
> > from CMake to distutils in UFC?
>
> I can take a look if you want.

Thanks!

--
Anders
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to