On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:17:36AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: >> Why not support both (as PETSc does)? A top level CMakeLists.txt >> descends in both the ffc subdirectory (calling distutils as e.g. >> described in this blog post: >> http://bloerg.net/2012/11/10/cmake-and-distutils.html) and ufc >> subdirectory. > This could be done, but we need the CMake for the the UFC extention > module configuration, which generates a Python module. Your example > above does not cover that case. As I understand it it is rather the > other way around: distutils need to call CMake.
Could the extension module utility be moved to DOLFIN? Or does it not fit in there? -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
