No, it is used by ffc. Martin
On 6 March 2013 08:35, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/06/2013 08:31 AM, Anders Logg wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:17:36AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: > > > >>> Why not support both (as PETSc does)? A top level CMakeLists.txt > >>> descends in both the ffc subdirectory (calling distutils as e.g. > >>> described in this blog post: > >>> http://bloerg.net/2012/11/10/cmake-and-distutils.html) and ufc > >>> subdirectory. > >> This could be done, but we need the CMake for the the UFC extention > >> module configuration, which generates a Python module. Your example > >> above does not cover that case. As I understand it it is rather the > >> other way around: distutils need to call CMake. > > > > Could the extension module utility be moved to DOLFIN? Or does it not > > fit in there? > > I do not think it fits in there. It is pure ufc stuff. Anyone who > creates a ufc class can wrap it to Python using the ufc extension module > stuff. > > Johan > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
