On 03/06/2013 08:31 AM, Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:17:36AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: > >>> Why not support both (as PETSc does)? A top level CMakeLists.txt >>> descends in both the ffc subdirectory (calling distutils as e.g. >>> described in this blog post: >>> http://bloerg.net/2012/11/10/cmake-and-distutils.html) and ufc >>> subdirectory. >> This could be done, but we need the CMake for the the UFC extention >> module configuration, which generates a Python module. Your example >> above does not cover that case. As I understand it it is rather the >> other way around: distutils need to call CMake. > > Could the extension module utility be moved to DOLFIN? Or does it not > fit in there?
I do not think it fits in there. It is pure ufc stuff. Anyone who creates a ufc class can wrap it to Python using the ufc extension module stuff. Johan _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
