On 01/03/2019 03:18, Guo, Yejun wrote: > yes, that's the reason I pending VP9 work. As for VP8 ROI, another thinking > is to first push vp8 roi, since libvpx is an external dependency and we don't > know the time when it is available for vp9 roi. Anyway, I'm open to both.
Presumably the forthcoming VP9 ROI stuff would have to be under a version check anyway, unlike the VP8 path? - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
