On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:51 AM Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/03/2019 03:18, Guo, Yejun wrote: > > yes, that's the reason I pending VP9 work. As for VP8 ROI, another thinking > > is to first push vp8 roi, since libvpx is an external dependency and we > > don't > > know the time when it is available for vp9 roi. Anyway, I'm open to both. > > Presumably the forthcoming VP9 ROI stuff would have to be under a version > check anyway, unlike the VP8 path? >
Yes, that only came about with 1.8.0 (which looks to have at least 1 bug). This can go forward, I didn't expect the discussion to change anything for vp8, I only thought it might be simpler to serialize things as the discussion around its use might effect the implementation here. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
