Paul B Mahol (12019-05-05): > Because Nicolas objected on initial implementation. Dunno if he still > object something on current updated patch.
Did it have a proper review on the mailing list? If yes, then I do not oppose it. If no, then I oppose it. Also, I would like to emphasize that you neglected to explain what you changed in this new version of the patch. That would have made it easier to decide. > This is to move forward and not be held back with blocking "arguments". So the question is: shall Paul be allowed to push significant patches that have not been reviewed? -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
