Marton Balint (12019-05-05): > I don't think you can insist on waiting for a review unless you plan to do > it yourself in a reasonable time frame.
Do you really think I have a duty to help Paul after all the insults he have subjected me? Really? I am not the only developer here. Paul could, for example, politely ask somebody, for example Timo who authored the rest of the file, to have a look. Note: I am pushing Timo on the line here, but if anybody asks me to review a patch they think I might be competent to review, I will gladly do it. Anybody except Paul, who has repeatedly insulted me. Do you consider this unreasonable? > Yes, this can degrade code quality, but I guess there is a general > assumption that people who get commit rights won't mess up too badly, and > the gains of more/better features are considered greater than the risks of > unreviewed code getting in. In the first thread, I noted that there was an obvious flaw in the patch. It was not the first time. It is not an isolated incident: the code quality has significantly degraded over the last few years: less future planning, increasing complexity. That happens because lack of review, amongst other things. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
