Carl Eugen Hoyos (12019-09-21): > I now wonder if this isn't much nicer than "You may use this FDK AAC > Codec software or modifications thereto only for purposes that are > authorized by appropriate patent licenses." > (In the sense that it doesn't try to conceal the true terms)
It is not "nicer", it is incompetent. If you read the whole COPYING file from libg722_1: https://github.com/traviscross/freeswitch/blob/master/libs/libg722_1/COPYING you realize is is not actually a license: is does not contain anything that gives the authorization to use their code. Compare to the license of fdk-aac, which is proper legalese, gives explicitly the right to use the code, and has been vetted by Debian. > Anyway, the more important question is how to deal with Freeswitch. Not accept their code unless they fix the license. Easy. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
