Hi, On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:05 AM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Sa., 21. Sept. 2019 um 16:51 Uhr schrieb Ronald S. Bultje > <rsbul...@gmail.com>: > > > So it appears, from the discussion (..), that although there is source > > code, it is not actually "open" in the sense that it's not > redistributable > > (at least not explicitly so) or modifiable? If I were hosting a copy on, > > say, github (or Debian), I'd be in legal trouble with this Freeswitch > > company? > > (Afaik) Freeswitch is a distributor of binaries based on FFmpeg's and > Polycom's source code. Freeswitch also hosts Polycom's source code. > > It appears to me that Freeswitch claims that while libg7221 is not a > Free library (and has a license incompatible with the GPL), it is > "open source" and can be distributed. Hm... Right, OK, so the question is indeed going to hinge on whether that is true or not. I suggest we open a github issue/request with exactly that question. :-). Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".