Hi, On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:53 AM Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:05 AM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Am Sa., 21. Sept. 2019 um 16:51 Uhr schrieb Ronald S. Bultje >> <rsbul...@gmail.com>: >> >> > So it appears, from the discussion (..), that although there is source >> > code, it is not actually "open" in the sense that it's not >> redistributable >> > (at least not explicitly so) or modifiable? If I were hosting a copy on, >> > say, github (or Debian), I'd be in legal trouble with this Freeswitch >> > company? >> >> (Afaik) Freeswitch is a distributor of binaries based on FFmpeg's and >> Polycom's source code. Freeswitch also hosts Polycom's source code. >> >> It appears to me that Freeswitch claims that while libg7221 is not a >> Free library (and has a license incompatible with the GPL), it is >> "open source" and can be distributed. > > > Hm... Right, OK, so the question is indeed going to hinge on whether that > is true or not. I suggest we open a github issue/request with exactly that > question. :-). > I take that back, there's a COPYING that addresses this: https://github.com/traviscross/freeswitch/blob/master/docs/COPYING Seems relatively sane to me? Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
