Reimar Döffinger <[email protected]> added the comment: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:40:45PM +0000, Roine Gustafsson wrote: > Roine Gustafsson <[email protected]> added the comment: > You are quoting from the Chroma license. As I've already quoted above, the > Chroma > license DOES NOT COVER libavcodec. libavcodec is distributed under the terms > of > LGPL, clearly specified in the bundled COPYING license text in the libavcodec > framework.
Maybe you just expressed yourself badly, but you are aware that you can not generally restrict reverse engineering for anything that just _uses_ libavcodec? Excerpt from the LGPL: > you may also combine or link [...] with the Library [...] provided that > the terms permit modification of the work for the customer's own use and > reverse engineering for debugging such modifications. This means that no part that currently falls under your Chroma license may link against libavcodec. Please consider this just a clarification and I apologize if you already knew this and I just misunderstood your response. ____________________________________________________ FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]> <https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue726> ____________________________________________________
