On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Baptiste Coudurier<baptiste.coudur...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/07/2009 10:57 PM, Jai Menon wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Baptiste >> Coudurier<baptiste.coudur...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/07/2009 10:12 PM, Alex Converse wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> One other big thing: Improvements to faac helps many people right now. >>>> People do (sadly) use faac for things. Improving the lavc encoder >>>> really only helps you and me until it's fit to merge, and who knows >>>> when that could be. >>> >>> That's true. On the other end, lavc encoder helps all users of lavc. >> >> Well, there is that libfaac wrapper so... > > Well, isn't the purpose of the encoder to drop it ?
Well, I was under the assumption that this was about the bigger question of having a free aac encoder, and if Alex chooses to improve libfaac and remove non free parts, then FFmpeg would still benefit. -- Regards, Jai _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list FFmpeg-soc@mplayerhq.hu https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
