On 07/07/2009 11:20 PM, Jai Menon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Baptiste
Coudurier<baptiste.coudur...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 07/07/2009 10:57 PM, Jai Menon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Baptiste
Coudurier<baptiste.coudur...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 07/07/2009 10:12 PM, Alex Converse wrote:
[...]
One other big thing: Improvements to faac helps many people right now.
People do (sadly) use faac for things. Improving the lavc encoder
really only helps you and me until it's fit to merge, and who knows
when that could be.
That's true. On the other end, lavc encoder helps all users of lavc.
Well, there is that libfaac wrapper so...
Well, isn't the purpose of the encoder to drop it ?
Well, I was under the assumption that this was about the bigger
question of having a free aac encoder, and if Alex chooses to improve
libfaac and remove non free parts, then FFmpeg would still benefit.
The project was started before the problem of license arised. The goal
of the project is to have an internal aac encoder.
Should we stop having internal decoders/encoders ?
--
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
FFmpeg maintainer http://www.ffmpeg.org
_______________________________________________
FFmpeg-soc mailing list
FFmpeg-soc@mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
