On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:49:55PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote: > On 07/07/2009 11:20 PM, Jai Menon wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Baptiste >> Coudurier<baptiste.coudur...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/07/2009 10:57 PM, Jai Menon wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Baptiste >>>> Coudurier<baptiste.coudur...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 07/07/2009 10:12 PM, Alex Converse wrote: >>>>>> [...] >>>>>> >>>>>> One other big thing: Improvements to faac helps many people right now. >>>>>> People do (sadly) use faac for things. Improving the lavc encoder >>>>>> really only helps you and me until it's fit to merge, and who knows >>>>>> when that could be. >>>>> That's true. On the other end, lavc encoder helps all users of lavc. >>>> Well, there is that libfaac wrapper so... >>> Well, isn't the purpose of the encoder to drop it ? >> >> Well, I was under the assumption that this was about the bigger >> question of having a free aac encoder, and if Alex chooses to improve >> libfaac and remove non free parts, then FFmpeg would still benefit. > > The project was started before the problem of license arised. The goal > of the project is to have an internal aac encoder. > > Should we stop having internal decoders/encoders ?
Personally I don't care since I'm going to finish this encoder sooner or later. Now only where to find that time... _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list FFmpeg-soc@mplayerhq.hu https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
