> But this method didn't seem to have any real effect on my video. It's a > long video, so I have made a shortened version available to see if anyone > has seen such a case. It's in 1080p and 23.97 fps. I'd like to save it in a > similar frame rate and size, but to be honest, the frame rate could be just > about anything as long as the interlacing was gone.
It is 29.97, not 23.97. > I tried checking for interlacing on the original video... None of the > frames are set as interlaced when I ran ffprobe. > The (short) video (6MB): > https://www.datafilehost.com/d/5474b665 So, is this video the original, or the output of something you tried? If it is the original, I'm not sure you can do anything about it. Why, because it is progressive video. To IVTC requires interlaced video @ 59.94 fields per sec, so that the 2:3 pulldown pattern can be found and removed. You can't find the 2:3 pulldown pattern in progressive video. While we humans can see the 2:3 pulldown pattern, I'm not sure what filter can. Maybe someone has a way, but I certainly do not know it. MB -- e-mail: [email protected] | [email protected] /~\ The ASCII [email protected] (140 char limit) \ / Ribbon Campaign Visit - URL: http://vidiot.com/ X Against http://vidiot.net/ / \ HTML Email "You're Sherlock Holmes, wear the damn hat!" - Watson to Sherlock Sherlock - The Abominable Bride - 1/01/16 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
