Andy Furniss wrote:
Vid looks like it's scaled up from 480 height and pillarboxed, so
the weave is not line for line anymore.
It's probably been scaled as progressive which on strong chroma will
(I think) be un-mendable. Saying that the sample can be scaled down
to 480 and the weave is 1:1 again, which holds out the possibility
that you could make it interlaced again with tinterlace and try to
get IVTC to run on that.
Maybe tinterlace was a crap idea as IIRC it would need field rate input.
Another way could be to scale down to 480 do a field rate deint and drop
duplicated frames.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
