Andy Furniss wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
Vid looks like it's scaled up from 480 height and pillarboxed, so
the weave is not line for line anymore.
It's probably been scaled as progressive which on strong chroma
will (I think) be un-mendable. Saying that the sample can be scaled
down to 480 and the weave is 1:1 again, which holds out the
possibility that you could make it interlaced again with tinterlace
and try to get IVTC to run on that.
Maybe tinterlace was a crap idea as IIRC it would need field rate
input. Another way could be to scale down to 480 do a field rate
deint and drop duplicated frames.
Though that's not really correct either.
Whatever further processing is done, I think that scaling down to 480 is
going to be the first step. I live in pal land, so don't have experience
of dealing with ntsc.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
