‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 11:07 AM, Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> wrote: > > I thought about this yesterday and came up with something like this: > > ffmpeg -i in.JPG -filter_complex "[0:0]loop=loop=-1:start=0:size=100 > > [looped] ; [looped] trim=start=0:end=10 [trimmed] ; [trimmed] > > fade=type=in:start_frame=0:duration=3:color=black [fadeIn]" -map [fadeIn] > > -c:v h264 -r 60 out.mkv > > or this > > ffmpeg -loop 1 -i in.JPG -filter_complex "[0:0] trim=start=0:end=200 > > [trimmed] ; [trimmed] fade=type=in:start_frame=0:duration=3:color=black > > [fadeIn]" -map [fadeIn] -c:v h264 out2.mkv > > (I'd just have to add a concat filter to the filter chain and an audio > > stream). I'm just not quite sure if there is a more smart way to do this > > (which for example would be a bit faster, since this is (in my opinion a bit > > slow for just duplicating a single frame). Well is there a smarter and/or > > faster way? > > And can you recommend which of these two commands above might be the better > > one? > > Please use xfade filter instead. >
What for? To not fade out to black and fade then in from black? Or are there other benefits of the xfade filter? With kind regards _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
