Hi, > Actually I don't see why it should be complicated. Maybe we're writing about > different things. You're still writing about the concat demuxer but I already > came to the conclusion that its easier to use the concat filter if you want > to insert transitions, since otherwise you'd have to preprocess the images > into videos and already add the transition at this point. With the concat > filter, you can use one filterchain to add the transitions and concatenate > the images in one step (no additional video files in the preprocessing > process)
Oh, yeah you're right, I assumed the original approach would be the one in op. But I meant it's complicated because ffmpeg didn't really have a transition filter for video until recently, and you're left managing everything yourself, like when to start reading/queuing frames for clip 2, when you can stop looping the first part, etc. Like, one filter vs one filterchain. Regards, Ted Park _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
