On 04/14/2020 02:40 PM, Ted Park wrote:
Hi,
The filter is not in the version of ffmpeg you are using, you will need to get
a more recent version for it to be there. Try downloading a recent static build
from the website or try compiling it yourself. (It's not in any release version
as far as I can tell)
Regards,
Ted Park
May I suggest that the most expeditious thing to do is to simply address the original question? I
would do it myself if I only had a brain... a heart... the nerve.
On 04/14/2020 09:43 AM, atticus via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 11:07 AM, Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I thought about this yesterday and came up with something like this:
>>> ffmpeg -i in.JPG -filter_complex "[0:0]loop=loop=-1:start=0:size=100
>>> [looped] ; [looped] trim=start=0:end=10 [trimmed] ; [trimmed]
>>> fade=type=in:start_frame=0:duration=3:color=black [fadeIn]" -map [fadeIn]
>>> -c:v h264 -r 60 out.mkv
>>> or this
>>> ffmpeg -loop 1 -i in.JPG -filter_complex "[0:0] trim=start=0:end=200
>>> [trimmed] ; [trimmed] fade=type=in:start_frame=0:duration=3:color=black
>>> [fadeIn]" -map [fadeIn] -c:v h264 out2.mkv
>>> (I'd just have to add a concat filter to the filter chain and an audio
>>> stream). I'm just not quite sure if there is a more smart way to do this
>>> (which for example would be a bit faster, since this is (in my opinion a bit
>>> slow for just duplicating a single frame). Well is there a smarter and/or
>>> faster way?
>>> And can you recommend which of these two commands above might be the better
>>> one?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
