On 8/31/20, Edward Park <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >> Again just typical FUD from same person. > > I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about??
Closely read your text that you removed out. > >> It is obviously slower, hahaha. > > > What is, AME or one of the prores encoders included in FFmpeg? I mean > obviously it'd depend on the job and hardware but for what it's worth I > compared prores_ks with 4444xq and it took around twice the wallclock time. > It did indeed take way more than twice the cpu time though, but if its > output has problems then the whole point is moot :/ Your comparison is not scientifically proven and thus is highly personally biased. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
