Hi, >> I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about?? > > Closely read your text that you removed out.
You're reading into it too much if it provoked fear or uncertainty in your mind, wasn't my intention. >> What is, AME or one of the prores encoders included in FFmpeg? I mean >> obviously it'd depend on the job and hardware but for what it's worth I >> compared prores_ks with 4444xq and it took around twice the wallclock time. >> It did indeed take way more than twice the cpu time though, but if its >> output has problems then the whole point is moot :/ > > Your comparison is not scientifically proven and thus is highly > personally biased. Yes it was an observation of a single test case. I did say it was pointless. And I think being biased towards fairness is something to be avoided, at least personally, that is. Regards, Ted Park _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
